Sunday, March 18, 2018

A QUESTION OF INTENT

Whenever these negotiations (such as they are) come to a decipherable end, one thing will be clear: THE FACTS WILL NOT BE ARGUABLE.

The conduct of Trump constitutes obstruction of justice IF he had the requisite criminal intent as distinguished from " it was not my intent to break any law."

That's a tough one to prove.  If his base can come back together, a repeat of the 2016 election ensues and Trump walks away. This brings his charm and personal appeal into play. OR, can common sense regroup and realize that one and one will always make two?

TRUMP vs MUELLER--------BALBOA vs CREED---BUCKLE UP----THE WORLD'S AT STAKE


Sunday, March 11, 2018

AM I HAVING SOLE VISION

Don't you sense it or is it too unpleasant for what you thought the end would be?

The world is going nuts, climate wise. Everything in the sky is SEVERE, to the point of kill (or over-kill). There's no such thing as moderation. Human conduct echoes terrestrial misconduct as people kill people in time with hell from hand held plurality weapons. Is there no end to this mayhem?

Why do horrific endings to sci-fi movies of the past post themselves as reality scenarios of the present? Why are mad-men rulers of the past today's norm?

BECAUSE THE WORLD IS COMING APART AND THE TOOLS OF ITS DESTRUCTION WERE INSTALLED BY ITS BASE?

Can we turn on our masters?